Re: [PATCH]: proc: export a processes resource limits via proc/<pid>

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:56:11AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:59:18 -0400
> > > Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Currently, there exists no method for a process to query the resource
> > > > limits of another process.  They can be inferred via some mechanisms
> > > > but they cannot be explicitly determined.  Given that this
> > > > information can be usefull to know during the debugging of an
> > > > application, I've written this patch which exports all of a
> > > > processes limits via /proc/<pid>/limits.
> > > 
> > > I'm struggling with this a bit.  Sure, it _might_ be handy on some
> > > occasions to be able to get at this information.  But I've never seen
> > > anyone ask for it before, and it _is_ determinable by other means, if only
> > > strace.
> > 
> > I've wanted this information on multiple occasions in the past and was
> > mystified that there was no way to determine it.  And no, I don't feel
> > that strace is an answer -- given a running process, how do I use strace
> > to find out what its current ulimits are?
> 
> You stop it and force it to execute rlimit(2) in its context, of
> course! What could be simpler? 
> 
I would think reading a file in /proc would be simpler :), especially if you're
in a position where attaching to the process through ptrace isnt feasible. For
instance, if you were an application running as the result of a core dump when
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern were a pipe, preforming your operation wouldn't be
particularly possible.  Likewise, if your a sysadmin and you want to check what
your processes limits were, you could follow your method, but I would think you
would much rather avoid needing to send several ptrace commands to your
commands, interrupting its work if you didn't have to.

> The reason we never see questions about this is because relatively few
> people are using limits. Instead we see weekly questions about fork
> bombs.
> 
But we do see questions about this. I've had a few requests, and at least two
more people have popped up on this thread supporting it.

Regards
Neil

-- 
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *Software Engineer
 *Red Hat, Inc.
 *nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
 *http://pgp.mit.edu
 ***************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/