Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re:nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:41:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
>> getting lost.  Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
>> transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
>
> Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions were 
> getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not solved?

Judging from the regression lists and the regression reports we get 
post-release both on lkml and in the kernel Bugzilla we have much more 
than 100 unfixed regressions since 2.6.20 (plus regressions from older 
kernels...).

Tracking that many regressions is one problem (although getting all bug 
reports in Bugzilla would make this quite easy), but the bigger problem 
is how to get them debugged and resolved.

> 	Jeff

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/