On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Jason Dixon wrote:Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it mustWhy is it so difficult to understand dual licensing?
remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
license, but the original copyright and license permission remains
intact. Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD
code and have no problem understanding this. Why is this so difficult
for the Linux brain share to absorb?
Maybe because Reyk's code was never dual-licensed?