Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> MTD
> 
> Subject         : error: implicit declaration of function 'cfi_interleave'
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/272
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> Caused-By       : ?
> Handled-By      : David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Patch           : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/9/586
> Status          : patch available 

This isn't really a regression -- it's been like this for years. It's a
non-functional configuration which doesn't really make sense, and would
only crop up with randconfig (or crack).

Linus was offered the patch a few weeks ago, but didn't take it -- it's
not really a priority for 2.6.23. It's in my git tree and will be pushed
when the 2.6.24 merge window opens.

http://git.infradead.org/?p=mtd-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=241651d04d672fb685b2874707016cbbf95931e5

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/