Re: patch: improve generic_file_buffered_write() (2nd try 1/2)

[Nick Piggin]

On Saturday 08 September 2007 19:43, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Lustre should probably have to be ported over to write_begin/write_end in
> > order to use it too. With the patches in -mm, if a filesystem is still
> > using prepare_write/commit_write, the vm reverts to a safe path which
> > avoids the deadlock (and allows multi-seg io copies), but copies the data
> > twice.
>
> Not quite relevant for the performance problem. The situation is like
> this:
>
> lustre servers  <-lustre network protocol-> lustre client <-NFS-> desktop
>
> The NFSd problem is on the lustre client that only plays gateway. That
> is not to say that the lustre servers or desktop loose performance due
> to fragmenting writes too but it isn't that noticeable there.

OK, but the filesystem client would need to support write_begin/write_end
in order for writes to do multi-seg iovecs. nfsd of course will also be fixed
by the earlier patch I referenced, but you did want userspace multi-seg
writes to work too...


> > OTOH, this is very likely to go upstream, so your filesystem will need to
> > be ported over sooner or later anyway.
>
> Lustre copies the ext3 source from the kernel, patches in some extra
> features and renames them during build. So one the one hand it always
> breaks whenever someone meddles with the ext3 code. On the other hand
> improvement for ext3 get picked up by lustre semi automatically.
>
> In this case lustre would get the begin_write() function from ext3 and
> use it.

OK. Yes ext3 is converted in -mm.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/