Re: [PATCH resend] Fix a lock problem in generic phy code

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Mon Sep 10 2007 - 22:21:34 EST


On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:45:50PM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
>
> > Could you please audit all instances of physdev->lock and add
> > _bh where necessary? I can see that at least phys_stop also
> > needs the _bh.
>
> I think the patch does all that's necessary. At least, there're no error
> messages in the logs anymore. I didn't check if there's an error on
> unload, though.

Sorry, but you can't rely on the non-existence of lockdep
messages as a proof of correctness :)

If we're going to fix the obvious bugs here, we should fix
the subtle ones too as otherwise they'll be much harder to
notice with this patch merged.

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/