Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> By definition any container (about to be renamed control group)
> subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit
> redundant.
> 
> Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched"

Done (in the latest patch I sent a while back)!

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/