Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting
From: Laurent Vivier
Date: Tue Sep 11 2007 - 05:39:21 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This new version remove conditional compilation on GUEST_ACCOUNTING.
>
> excellent! For all 4 patches:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>
> i'd suggest inclusion into 2.6.24.
Thank you.
> can the /proc change break anything? Any old procps version perhaps?
I've tested top and ps from procps 3.0.5, 3.1.8, 3.1.14, 3.2.1 and 3.2.7 without
any problem.
And as values are read with a sscanf() by procps, I think adding a field at the
end of the line is not a problem.
For those who want to play, I've attached a patch to procps-3.2.7 to display
guest time in top.
Regards,
Laurent
--
------------- Laurent.Vivier@xxxxxxxx --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
Index: procps-3.2.7/top.c
===================================================================
--- procps-3.2.7.orig/top.c 2007-08-08 16:13:17.000000000 +0200
+++ procps-3.2.7/top.c 2007-08-10 16:46:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -935,7 +935,8 @@
cpus[Cpu_tot].x = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
cpus[Cpu_tot].y = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
cpus[Cpu_tot].z = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
- num = sscanf(buf, "cpu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu",
+ cpus[Cpu_tot].g = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
+ num = sscanf(buf, "cpu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu",
&cpus[Cpu_tot].u,
&cpus[Cpu_tot].n,
&cpus[Cpu_tot].s,
@@ -943,7 +944,8 @@
&cpus[Cpu_tot].w,
&cpus[Cpu_tot].x,
&cpus[Cpu_tot].y,
- &cpus[Cpu_tot].z
+ &cpus[Cpu_tot].z,
+ &cpus[Cpu_tot].g
);
if (num < 4)
std_err("failed /proc/stat read");
@@ -960,9 +962,10 @@
cpus[i].x = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
cpus[i].y = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
cpus[i].z = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
- num = sscanf(buf, "cpu%u %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu",
+ cpus[i].g = 0; // FIXME: can't tell by kernel version number
+ num = sscanf(buf, "cpu%u %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu %Lu",
&cpus[i].id,
- &cpus[i].u, &cpus[i].n, &cpus[i].s, &cpus[i].i, &cpus[i].w, &cpus[i].x, &cpus[i].y, &cpus[i].z
+ &cpus[i].u, &cpus[i].n, &cpus[i].s, &cpus[i].i, &cpus[i].w, &cpus[i].x, &cpus[i].y, &cpus[i].z, &cpus[i].g
);
if (num < 4)
std_err("failed /proc/stat read");
@@ -2879,10 +2882,11 @@
// we'll trim to zero if we get negative time ticks,
// which has happened with some SMP kernels (pre-2.4?)
#define TRIMz(x) ((tz = (SIC_t)(x)) < 0 ? 0 : tz)
- SIC_t u_frme, s_frme, n_frme, i_frme, w_frme, x_frme, y_frme, z_frme, tot_frme, tz;
+ SIC_t u_frme, s_frme, n_frme, i_frme, w_frme, x_frme, y_frme, z_frme, g_frme, tot_frme, tz, u_tmp;
float scale;
- u_frme = cpu->u - cpu->u_sav;
+ u_tmp = cpu->u - cpu->g;
+ u_frme = TRIMz(u_tmp - cpu->u_sav);
s_frme = cpu->s - cpu->s_sav;
n_frme = cpu->n - cpu->n_sav;
i_frme = TRIMz(cpu->i - cpu->i_sav);
@@ -2890,7 +2894,8 @@
x_frme = cpu->x - cpu->x_sav;
y_frme = cpu->y - cpu->y_sav;
z_frme = cpu->z - cpu->z_sav;
- tot_frme = u_frme + s_frme + n_frme + i_frme + w_frme + x_frme + y_frme + z_frme;
+ g_frme = cpu->g - cpu->g_sav;
+ tot_frme = u_frme + s_frme + n_frme + i_frme + w_frme + x_frme + y_frme + z_frme + g_frme;
if (tot_frme < 1) tot_frme = 1;
scale = 100.0 / (float)tot_frme;
@@ -2908,13 +2913,14 @@
(float)w_frme * scale,
(float)x_frme * scale,
(float)y_frme * scale,
- (float)z_frme * scale
+ (float)z_frme * scale,
+ (float)g_frme * scale
)
);
Msg_row += 1;
// remember for next time around
- cpu->u_sav = cpu->u;
+ cpu->u_sav = u_tmp;
cpu->s_sav = cpu->s;
cpu->n_sav = cpu->n;
cpu->i_sav = cpu->i;
@@ -2922,6 +2928,7 @@
cpu->x_sav = cpu->x;
cpu->y_sav = cpu->y;
cpu->z_sav = cpu->z;
+ cpu->g_sav = cpu->g;
#undef TRIMz
}
Index: procps-3.2.7/top.h
===================================================================
--- procps-3.2.7.orig/top.h 2007-08-08 16:14:47.000000000 +0200
+++ procps-3.2.7/top.h 2007-08-08 17:01:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@
// calculations. It exists primarily for SMP support but serves
// all environments.
typedef struct CPU_t {
- TIC_t u, n, s, i, w, x, y, z; // as represented in /proc/stat
- TIC_t u_sav, s_sav, n_sav, i_sav, w_sav, x_sav, y_sav, z_sav; // in the order of our display
+ TIC_t u, n, s, i, w, x, y, z, g; // as represented in /proc/stat
+ TIC_t u_sav, s_sav, n_sav, i_sav, w_sav, x_sav, y_sav, z_sav, g_sav; // in the order of our display
unsigned id; // the CPU ID number
} CPU_t;
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@
#define STATES_line2x6 "%s\03" \
" %#4.1f%% \02us,\03 %#4.1f%% \02sy,\03 %#4.1f%% \02ni,\03 %#4.1f%% \02id,\03 %#4.1f%% \02wa,\03 %#4.1f%% \02hi,\03 %#4.1f%% \02si\03\n"
#define STATES_line2x7 "%s\03" \
- "%#5.1f%%\02us,\03%#5.1f%%\02sy,\03%#5.1f%%\02ni,\03%#5.1f%%\02id,\03%#5.1f%%\02wa,\03%#5.1f%%\02hi,\03%#5.1f%%\02si,\03%#5.1f%%\02st\03\n"
+ "%#4.1f%%\02us,\03%#4.1f%%\02sy,\03%#4.1f%%\02ni,\03%#5.1f%%\02id,\03%#4.1f%%\02wa,\03%#4.1f%%\02hi,\03%#4.1f%%\02si,\03%#4.1f%%\02st\03,\02%#4.1f%%\02g\n"
#ifdef CASEUP_SUMMK
#define MEMORY_line1 "Mem: \03" \
" %8luK \02total,\03 %8luK \02used,\03 %8luK \02free,\03 %8luK \02buffers\03\n"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature