Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure

[Anthony Liguori]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
> > Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM
> > paravirtualizations on other hypervisors.  However, I don't think this
> > is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just
> > use leaf 0.  I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch.
> >     
>
> Hm.  Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible
> hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if
> the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm
> one.  Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something?
>   

Yeah, that works with me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>     J
>
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/