Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size

[Christoph Lameter]

On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> It increases the lock hold times though. Otoh it might work out with the
> lock placement.

Yeah may be good for NUMA.
 
> Do you have any numbers that show this is worthwhile?

Tried to run AIM7 but the improvements are in the noise. I need a tests 
that really does large memory allocation and stresses the LRU. I could 
code something up but then Lee's patch addresses some of the same issues.
Is there any standard test that shows LRU handling regressions?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/