Re: [PATCH] Fallback to ipv4 if we try to add join IPv4 multicastgroup via ipv4-mapped address.

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

Hello,

David Stevens wrote:
> Dmitry,
>         Good catch; a couple comments:

Thank you for the response.

> >     struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
> >     int err;
> > +   int addr_type = ipv6_addr_type(addr);
> > +
> > +   if (addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED) {
> > +      __be32 v4addr = addr->s6_addr32[3];
> > +      struct ip_mreqn mreq;
> > +      mreq.imr_multiaddr.s_addr = v4addr;
> > +      mreq.imr_address.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
> > +      mreq.imr_ifindex = ifindex;
> > +
> > +      return ip_mc_join_group(sk, &mreq);
> > +   }
>
>         ipv6_addr_type() returns a bitmask, so you should use:
>
>         if (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED) {

I just c'n'pasted the code that checks for mapped addresses. In most 
cases it's just ==, not bitmask operation.

> Also, you should have a blank line after the "mreq" declaration.

ok.

> Ditto for both in ipv6_mc_sock_drop().


> I don't expect the multicast source filtering interface will
> behave well for mapped addresses, either. The mapped multicast
> address won't appear to be a multicast address (and return
> error there), and all the source filters would have to be
> v4mapped addresses and modify the v4 source filters for this
> to do as you expect. So, there's more to it (and it may be a
> bit messy) to support mapped multicast addresses fully. I'll
> think about that part some more.


Didn't have time to test it throughly. I've only checked that call 
succeeds and that all necessary igmp are sent. I hope, this weekend I'll 
have more time to check.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry Baryshkov

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/