Re: [PATCH] sched: Rationalize sys_sched_rr_get_interval()
From: Peter Williams
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 20:23:28 EST
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 16-10-2007 03:16, Peter Williams wrote:
...
I'd suggest that we modify sched_rr_get_interval() to return -EINVAL
(with *interval set to zero) if the target task is not SCHED_RR. That
way we can save a lot of unnecessary code. I'll work on a patch.
...
I like this idea! But, since this a system call maybe at least
something like RFC would be nicer...
We would be just modifying the code to meet that specification so a
patch would be OK. Anyone who wants to comment will do so anyway :-).
Sorry for too harsh words.
I didn't consider them harsh.
So, I can't be mistaken for a rapper yet? I'll work on it...
Cheers,
Jarek P.
PS: Peter, for some unknown reason I don't receive your messages.
If you get back some errors from my side I'd be interested to see
it (alternative: jarkao2 at gmail.com).
I haven't seen any bounce notifications. I've added the qmail address
as a CC.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/