Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Revisit.

[Gautham R Shenoy]

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:23:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > 
> > Unless I am reading the patch wrongly, it seems cpu_hotplug_begin() is called 
> > while holding the cpu_add_remove_lock mutex. So, another CPU cannot come in
> > and do the same until _cpu_down() is over.
> 
> Ahh, in that case I take back that objection, although maybe a comment 
> about the required nesting within the other mutex is in order? Or maybe 
> it's there and I just missed it (blush).

Good point! I'll add the comment before cpu_hotplug_begin().


> 
> 			Linus

Thanks and Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/