Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH]PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Thu Oct 18 2007 - 11:59:35 EST
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> If we can't just cancel the work, can't we do something like
>
> if (cancel_work_sync(w))
> w->func(w);
>
> instead?
We do an equivalent of this -- all that we care about that w->func(w)
would do is enable_irq() and the rest we want to skip at this point. We
probably do not need the counter in the end though.
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/