Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actuallychanging

[Steven Rostedt]

--
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Roel Kluin wrote:

> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> >  0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I think you wanted a patch here?
>

But it is here.  Gregory is a Zen master, and this patch does exactly what
he wanted it to do.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/