Re: [PATCH 00/11] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.24-rc review

[Avi Kivity]

Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > The following patches fix fallout from the main 2.6.24 KVM merge.  An
> > > exception is the movnti emulation patch, which adds support for Linux
> > > 2.6.16 guests.
> > >
> > > The patches can be found in kvm.git in the branch kvm-updates-2.6.24.
> > > There is also a branch kvm-updates-2.6.25 which will form the basis of
> > > the next merge window submission.
> > >
> > > Please review the patches and let me know if something is wrong or if
> > > a patch is missing.
> > >
> > >   
> >
> >
> > Laurent, I believe the following patch (in kvm-updates-2.6.25) needs 
> > to go into 2.6.24 as well.  Can you comment on this?
>
> What kind of comment do you want ?

Well, whether it needs to go into .24.

> What are the requirements to go in 2.6.24 instead of 2.6.25 ?
>
> Is a bug correction enough ? :-P

It has to fix something real-life, in a real guest.

> This patch correct a bad behavior of x86_emulate_insn() in case of 
> error with a REP prefix.
>
> This patch is needed because, without it, when REP prefix is used with 
> an instruction failing for some reasons (like IO or page fault) we 
> don't restore all modified registers (like RSI and RDI), but only ECX 
> and EIP, so when we re-enter in x86_emulate_insn() we modify again an 
> already modified value. Moreover, this patch manages correctly the 
> case where the instruction fails in writeback().

Okay, I guess it is needed.  Can you backport it to the branch?  It's 
very different from kvm-updates-2.6.24...

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/