Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > but what bothers me even more is the large picture. Linux's 
> > development is still fundamentally skewed towards bandwidth (which 
> > goes up with hardware advances anyway), while the focus on latencies 
> > is very lacking (which users do care about much more and which 
> > usually does _not_ improve with improved hardware), so i cannot see 
> > why we shouldnt apply this. Reminds me of the illogical, almost 
> > superstitious resistence against the relatime patch. (which is not 
> > in 2.6.24 mind you - killed for good)
> 
> Try `mount -o relatime' and prepare to be surprised ;)

i mean this one:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch

this actually makes relatime practical.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/