Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug

[Roel Kluin]

Ray Lee wrote:

> I'm sorry, perhaps I poured myself a cup of stupid this morning, but
> isn't the above patch effectively introducing a BUG where none could
> be reached before? In other words, for the patch to have zero
> behavioral change, wouldn't it have to remove the BUG() altogether?

True, but obviously not intended. I think the intention was to expose this bug.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/