Re: [PATCH] unlock before bug returns

[Roel Kluin]

Rene Herman wrote:
> On 10/22/2007 02:40 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
>> NAK. This will cause double-unlock when CONFIG_BUG is disabled. It's
>> incorrect to assume that BUG() will always terminate the current
>> process.
> 
> (which by the way also means that the "return;" delete from your
> original patch changes behaviour for !CONFIG_BUG, and probably not for
> the better).
> 
> Rene.

Thanks for your comments. A patch containing this suggestion is:

[PATCH retry] return hidden bug and unlock bugs.

Roel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/