Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Oct 23 2007 02:13, Chris Wright wrote:
>* Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> On Oct 22 2007 22:16, Chris Wright wrote:
>> >Yes, and I think we can still improve performance although I can't see
>> >anyway to help out the modular case, so I guess it will have to incur
>> >the hit that's always been there.  I think your Kconfig option is a
>> >decent compromise.
>> 
>> (Un)registering security modules is a one-time hit. You do not load
>> and unload modules on a per-minute basis outside debugging.
>
>I'm referring to the hit for indirect calls

Indeed, I just seen that. Not too nice :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/