Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On 10/23/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not sure what this is. Maybe the slowing SLUB solves the race.
> 
> What kind of race are you thinking of? What I initially thought was
> that the problem is that SLUB messes up some other VM heuristics due
> to different object sizes, not holding on to empty slabs, and/or page
> allocator pass-through. I guess only object size is affected by
> debugging, though?

The number of objects per page is reduced by enabling full debugging. That 
triggers a potential of more order 1 allocations but we are failing at 
order 0 allocs. slub_debug=F does not increase object size with debugging 
information but keeps things as they are while doing as much verification 
of slab integrity as possible.

One--potentially far fetched theory--is that the difference in alloc 
performance may trigger a race. But I guess it is more likely that we will 
find something wrong with the gfp flags (that I recategorized for 2.6.24).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/