Re: [RFC/git patch] move samples/ to Documentation/markers/

[Randy Dunlap]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Honestly, I don't care at all about building the code.  If that's what 
> you want, great.

Yes, that is wanted.  They bitrot too easily -- not good.

> My objection is more to adding a samples/ directory, which is contra to 
> past experience:
> 
> A new net driver sample should go in drivers/net/ like the existing 
> skeleton files I already listed, not samples/net/.  A top-level 

Can't disagree with that.

> "samples/" seems like it exists only duplicate the rest of the tree 
> hierarchy.

It seems odd to be building code in Documentation/, but I can live
with that.  It was primarily Christoph who was opposed to that.
He suggested samples/ and I went along with it just to break the
impasse (since no one else was making any comments on it at that
time).

Sam, would building code in Documentation/ cause problems for
kbuild?

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/