Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[Paul Jackson]

David wrote:
> I personally prefer an approach where cpusets take the responsibility for 
> determining how policies change (they use set_mempolicy() anyway to effect 
> their mems boundaries) because it's cpusets that has changed the available 
> nodemask out from beneath the application.

Agreed.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/