Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[David Rientjes]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> We would need two fields in the policy structure
> 
> 1. The specified nodemask (generally ignored)
> 

What I've called pol->passed_nodemask.

> 2. The effective nodemask (specified & cpuset_mems_allowed)
> 

Which is pol->v.nodes.

> If we have these two then its easy to get a bit further by making
> the first nodemask a relative nodemask. The calculation of the effective
> nodemask changes somewhat but the logic is then applicable to MPOL_BIND as 
> well.
> 

Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/