Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection

[Jiri Kosina]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> Bzzt.  You get a false deadlock with multiple threads like so:
> Thread A of task B takes lock 1
> Thread C of task D takes lock 2
> Thread C of task D blocks on lock 1
> Thread E of task B blocks on lock 2

	A potential for deadlock occurs if a process controlling a locked 
	region is put to sleep by attempting to lock another process' 
	locked region. If the system detects that sleeping until a locked 
	region is unlocked would cause a deadlock, fcntl() shall fail with 
	an [EDEADLK] error.

This is what POSIX says [1], even after being modified with respect to 
POSIX Threads Extension, right?

So it doesn't deal with threads at all, just processess are taken into 
account. Probably for a reason :)

[1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/fcntl.html

-- 
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/