Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating

[Glauber de Oliveira Costa]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> and just in case it's not obvious: i am not arguing for the inclusion of 
> the patch, i'm just pointing out the plain fact that in the case where 
> the TSC _is_ reliable, 5 different clocksource drivers for has obvious 
> disadvantages. Anyone arguing against that simple point needs his head 
> examined :) Once we can pass around calibration information from the 
> host to the guest (which we dont do at the moment) there will be reason 
> not to use the native clocksource driver in the guest.
If you sustain that we cannot have a reliable synchronization test
mechanism, neither do I. All this is based in the assumption that a bad
tsc will fail such tests.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHJyAHjYI8LaFUWXMRAtYoAJ9l5kNodRLfTsNHDvyioufM7SQzTACfarEy
XXq3sDq9uxZ/72hhA46YmgM=
=DwN/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/