Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[Paul Jackson]

David wrote:
> That's what Choice C is intended to replace

Yes, one remaps nodes it can't provide, and the other removes
nodes it can't provide.

Yup - that's a logical difference.  So ... I would think that
the only solution that would be satisfactory to apps that require
specific hardware nodes would be to simply not move them in the
first place.  If you do that, then none of these Choices matter
in the slightest.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/