Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should just 
> > > > *work* with sensible defaults.  I don't use an initrd, or an initramfs, 
> > > > and have no intention of ever doing so.
> > > nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of a 
> > > bzImage too? Am i wrong?
> > Nope.  It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is 
> > linked into the kernel binary.
>
> would be nice to have a single-image variant for all of this. having the 
> separate initrd was always trouble - and it's pointless as well. (we 
> rarely update the initrd without updating the vmlinuz as well)

We do.  Am I missing something?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/