Hi Richard,Thought about it, but they were so simple, I believed they would better be merged...
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Make a single va_start() -> va_end() path + fixing:Ok, this should be 2 separate patches then.
The warning fixes are all good, but I fail to see the point of the va_end()Not really. Many seem to like a single return and since this made it one va_end() to every va_start(), I thought it would be appropriate. But if not, then I will only filter this hit out from the va_start()->va_end()-testing and get going.
one. That doesn't seem to bring any sort of improvement while adding one
variable to the stack and one loop test. Any explanation here ?
I'll push the warning fix for now, thanks.Alright, thank you.
Cheers,cu
Samuel.