Re: [PATCH 3/6] Suspend: Use common prefix in messages

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Make suspend messages start with one common prefix "PM: ".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> I do not think I like the PREFIX idea (see other message).

The problem is that we use three different types of messages:
- with no prefix at all
- with "PM: "
- with "swsusp: "
and I think that we should use just one, preferably "PM: ".

> > @@ -344,11 +344,12 @@ static int enter_state(suspend_state_t s
> >  	if (!mutex_trylock(&pm_mutex))
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  
> > -	printk("Syncing filesystems ... ");
> > +	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "Syncing filesystems ... ");
> >  	sys_sync();
> > -	printk("done.\n");
> > +	printk(KERN_INFO "done.\n");
> 
> 
> Plus this is wrong.

Yes, I've had a temporary blackout regarding prinkt(), not even making much
sense ...

I'll resend the entire series in a while.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/