Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

[Tom Tucker]

On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 18:15 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:35:42PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 15:49 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >...
> > > No.  That's the wrong question.  What's the real upside?
> > 
> > Explicitly documenting what comprises the kernel API (external,
> > supported) and what comprises the kernel implementation (internal, not
> > supported).
> >...
> 
> There is not, never was, and never will be, any supported external API 
> of the kernel.

Philosophically I understand what you're saying, but in practical terms
there is the issue of managing core API like kmalloc. Although kmalloc
_could_ change, doing so would be extremely painful. In fact anyone who
proposed such a change would have to have a profoundly powerful argument
as to why it was necessary.

I think this patchset is an attempt to make it easier to identify and
review these kinds of interfaces.

>  
> cu
> Adrian
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/