Re: [PATCH] -mm (2.4.26-rc3-mm1) v2 Smack using capabilities 32and 33

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:38:56 -0800
Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch takes advantage of the increase in capability bits
> to allocate capabilities for Mandatory Access Control. Whereas
> Smack was overloading a previously allocated capability it is
> now using a pair, one for overriding access control checks and
> the other for changes to the MAC configuration.
> 
> The two capabilities allocated should be obvious in their intent.
> The comments in capability.h are intended to make it clear that
> there is no intention that implementations of MAC LSM modules
> be any more constrained by the presence of these capabilities
> than an implementation of DAC LSM modules are by the analogous
> DAC capabilities.
> 
> 
> +		!__capable(current, CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
> +		!__capable(current, CAP_MAC_ADMIN))

Is there any reason for not using plain old capable() here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/