Re: [patch 1/1] Writeback fix for concurrent large and small file writes
From: Frans Pop
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 21:14:53 EST
Two typos in comments.
Cheers,
FJP
Michael Rubin wrote:
> + * The flush tree organizes the dirtied_when keys with the rb_tree. Any
> + * inodes with a duplicate dirtied_when value are link listed together.
> This + * link list is sorted by the inode's i_flushed_when. When both the
> + * dirited_when and the i_flushed_when are indentical the order in the
> + * linked list determines the order we flush the inodes.
s/dirited_when/dirtied_when/
> + * Here is where we interate to find the next inode to process. The
> + * strategy is to first look for any other inodes with the same
> dirtied_when + * value. If we have already processed that node then we
> need to find + * the next highest dirtied_when value in the tree.
s/interate/iterate/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/