Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops onx86_64

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to 
> wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm 
> patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."

Well I guess you have to get used to maintainership I think. F.e. the 
s390 people tested this patchset without requiring a backport. 
Typically arch maintainers test mm and do not force the patches back into 
mainline. I am a bit surprised since Andi and I never had this issue.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/