Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c

[H. Peter Anvin]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I have read the hep text, but are the advantages of HZ == 300 really 
> visible or was this more theoretical?
>
> In the latter case, we might remove the HZ == 300 choice instead.

Well, we have, for various architectures:

HZ == 48, 100, 128, 250, 256, 300, 1000, 1024

You'd have to kill 48, 128, 256, 300 and 1024.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/