Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:34:09 -0500
Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:17:36 -0800
> > Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Then init_net needs to be not GPL limited. Sorry, we need to allow
> >> non GPL network drivers.  There is a fine line between keeping the
> >> binary seething masses from accessing random kernel functions, and allowing
> >> reasonable (but still non GPL) things like ndiswrapper to use network
> >> device interface.
> >>
> > I spoke too soon earlier, ndiswrapper builds and loads against current
> > 2.6.24-rc3. Vmware and proprietary VPN software probably do not. Once again I don't
> > give a damn, but the enterprise distro vendors certainly care.
> ...
> 
> Naw, enterprise (or any other) distro vendors shouldn't have any issues here,
> since they can just patch their kernels around any issues.
> 
> But it looks like Eric has this one thought out well enough.

So you are saying all this is not a problem, fine.
Any affected parties can certainly lobby for themselves. But I suspect
they all think the kernel community is a bunch of ... and will just ignore
the problem. 

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/