Re: [local DoS] Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc4

From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Date: Tue Dec 04 2007 - 11:04:49 EST


Em Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:00:05 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> escreveu:

|
| * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| >
| >
| > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
| > >
| > > sched_rr_get_interval(1, NULL);
| >
| > Looks like we have a zero "cfs_rq->load.weight".
| >
| > Ingo? Both sched_slice() and __sched_slice() do a divide by the
| > runqueue weight, and at least dequeue_task_fair() explicitly checks
| > for that being zero, so clearly zero is a possible value. Hmm?
|
| yeah, i can reproduce this crash too.
|
| The problem is on SMP: if sched_rr_get_interval() gets a task from an
| otherwise idle runqueue, then rq->load.weight is 0. Normally
| sched_slice() is only used on a busy runqueue. So the correct fixup site
| is not in sched_slice() but in sys_sched_rr_get_interval() - i'm working
| on the right fix, i hope to be able to send a pull request in a few
| minutes.

Ingo, I can reproduce this w/o SMP support as well.

(Also, the backtrace I sent was reproduced on a UP machine with a
SMP kernel).

--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/