Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3 can't see sd partitions on Alpha

From: Bob Tracy
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 09:55:45 EST


I wrote:
> "git diff 2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a3 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba"
> produced a relatively short patch (18,437 bytes). The list of involved
> files:
>
> (omitted)
>
> Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll start
> backing out the above diffs in related groups and continue until I've got
> a working kernel. For lack of an obvious target, I'll start with the
> seemingly innocuous change to sysctl_check.c. I'll report back when I've
> got something.

That was quick :-). Backing out the sysctl_check.c diff gives me a
working kernel. Beats the #$%@! out of me how/why, though.

Michael Cree: could you try backing out the diff below from your
2.6.24-rc3 tree and see if things are now working for you?

Here's "uname -a", just to confirm (maybe) I'm running on what I say
works:

Linux smirkin 2.6.24-rc2-g6f37ac79-dirty #2 Fri Dec 7 08:03:12 CST 2007 alpha

Here's the diff I backed out (patch -R). It's short...

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_check.c b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
index 5a2f2b2..4abc6d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl_check.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_table[] = {
{ NET_ROSE, "rose", trans_net_rose_table },
{ NET_IPV6, "ipv6", trans_net_ipv6_table },
{ NET_X25, "x25", trans_net_x25_table },
- { NET_TR, "tr", trans_net_tr_table },
+ { NET_TR, "token-ring", trans_net_tr_table },
{ NET_DECNET, "decnet", trans_net_decnet_table },
/* NET_ECONET not used */
{ NET_SCTP, "sctp", trans_net_sctp_table },

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy | "They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist- "
rct@xxxxxxxx | - Last words of Union General John Sedgwick,
| Battle of Spotsylvania Court House, U.S. Civil War
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/