Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters
From: Divy Le Ray
Date: Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:06:47 EST
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Divy Le Ray wrote:
>>> From: Divy Le Ray <divy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add parity initialization for T3C adapters.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray <divy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h | 1
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c | 82 ++++++++++++
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c | 15 ++
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/regs.h | 248
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/sge.c | 24 +++-
>>> drivers/net/cxgb3/t3_hw.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++---
>>> 6 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> dropped patches 2-3, did not apply
>>
>>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I noticed that you applied the first one of this 3 patches series
to the
> #upstream-fixes branch.
> These patches are intended to the #upstream (2.6.25) branch, as
they are
> built on top of the
> last 10 patches committed - 9 from me, and the white space clean up
> (thanks!).
> May be this is the reason why they did not apply.
Ah... you need to tell me these things. I looked for a kernel version
in your messages but did not see one.
I had put it in the introduction mail, I should have added the kernel
version in the patch titles.
I'll do from now on.
Does the patch #1 need to be reverted for 2.6.24?
No, it can be applied to 2.6.24.
The 2 next patches seem to apply cleanly on #upstream when patch #1 is
popped out the patch stack.
Hi Jeff,
Did you get a chance to apply these patches #upstream ?
Cheers,
Divy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/