Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

[Rene Herman]

On 16-12-07 22:42, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> It probably comes down to which version is bigger (you probably also 
> want to try uninlining.)

slow_down_io() sort of needs to stay inline due to the REALLY_SLOW_IO thing. 
That stuff could use a cleanup, but that would be a diferent patch.

> > Thanks for the heads up (also saw the SMBIOS update to this) but those 
> > don't seem to be a problem in fact. David Reed has been running with 
> > the simple udelay(2) version of this and reported no more hangs. He 
> > moreover reported no trouble after booting with "acpi=off" meaning 
> > that things seem to be fine pre-acpi which the boot code (and this 
> > io_delay_init) is. So I believe we get to ignore those.
>
> Okay, so there is something inside ACPI which tickles this.  Which 
> brings further credibility that it's activating a debugging hack, 
> probably inside the SuperIO/system controller chip.
>
> It would be interesting to know exactly which part of ACPI triggers 
> this.  I bet it is a reference to system controller namespace.

Do you expect a BIOS update to be able to fix it? If so, I guess any DMI 
hack should take BIOS version into account.

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/