Re: Final kprobes rollup patches

[Ingo Molnar]

* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > cool! Please Cc: lkml and Harvey as well so that there's less 
> > overlap in unification work - Harvey spent quite some time unifying 
> > and cleaning up the kprobes code during the past week.
> 
> Should I rewrite it based on current git tree?
> My patch includes 3 part of patches.
> - 2 Bugfix patches (which is not merged yet.)
> - 2 booster patches (ditto)
> - 2 unification patches (most of this patches are already done by Harvey's patch)

would it be easier/more robust to first did the unification patches and 
then get the bugfixes and new features in? That would give us your 
bugfixes and new features on both 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time.

feel free to do whichever approach you prefer - but it would be nice to 
preserve the unification and cleanup work done by Harvey.

btw., is any of your bugfixes 2.6.24 material?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/