Re: [patch 02/20] make the inode i_mmap_lock a reader/writer lock

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:52:09 -0500
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I keep these patches up to date for testing.  I don't have conclusive
> evidence whether they alleviate or exacerbate the problem nor by how
> much.  

When the queued locking from Ingo's x86 tree hits mainline,
I suspect that spinlocks may end up behaving a lot nicer.

Should I drop the rwlock patches from my tree for now and
focus on just the page reclaim stuff?

-- 
All Rights Reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/