Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Obvious counterpart to dma_map_sg.  Note that this is arch-independent
> code; sg_rings are backwards compatible with simple sg arrays.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/base/dma-mapping.c  |   13 +++++++++++++
>  include/linux/dma-mapping.h |    4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/sg_ring.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * Managed DMA API
> @@ -162,6 +163,59 @@ void dmam_free_noncoherent(struct device
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dmam_free_noncoherent);
>  
> +/**
> + * dma_map_sg_ring - Map an entire sg ring
> + * @dev: Device to free noncoherent memory for
> + * @sg: The sg_ring
> + * @direction: DMA_TO_DEVICE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE or DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL.
> + *
> + * This returns -ENOMEM if mapping fails.  It's not clear that telling you
> + * it failed is useful though.
> + */
> +int dma_map_sg_ring(struct device *dev, struct sg_ring *sg,
> +		     enum dma_data_direction direction)
> +{
> +	struct sg_ring *i;
> +	unsigned int num;
> +
> +	for (i = sg; i; i = sg_ring_next(i, sg)) {
> +		BUG_ON(i->num > i->max);
> +		num = dma_map_sg(dev, i->sg, i->num, direction);
> +		if (num == 0 && i->num != 0)
> +			goto unmap;
> +	}
> +	return 0;

I don't think that this works for IOMMUs that could merge sg entries.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/