[Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF]

[Tony Camuso]

To all,

The next few forwarded messages comprise my responses to Greg's
questions about the patch I submitted to deal with pci devices
that do not respond correctly to x86 mmconf accesses.

Please accept my apologies for not having including the community
in my original responses.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:58:45 -0500
From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx
To: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
References: 
<20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<20071219221751.20362.23451.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<20071219230447.GA24219@xxxxxxx>

Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >  
> > +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; 	/* direct.c */
>
> This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
> confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.

Should I resubmit that one patch? Or would you prefer I resubmit
the whole patch set?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/