Re: [PATCH 0/5] sg_ring for scsi

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:26:47 +1100
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Friday 21 December 2007 13:28:34 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I'm not sure about chaining the headers (as your sg_ring and
> > scsi_sgtable do) would simplify LLDs. Have you looked at ips or
> > qla1280?
> 
> Not yet, am working my way through the drivers, but I don't expect it will be 
> a simplification to the normal SCSI LLDs.  Most of them are mere consumers of
> sgs...

Some scsi drivers like ips access to sglist in a tricky way. I feel
that they don't work with the sg_ring interface well. So if you
convert scsi_lib.c to use sg_ring, please see how it works with the
tricky drivers before that.


> I'm not a SCSI person: I'm patching SCSI because I have to to get my
> own sg-using code clean :)

I'm SCSI-biased. If you don't convert scsi to use sg_ring, I don't
complain. :) Though it would be better to have only one mechanism to
handle large sglist in kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/