Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi,

Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In an extreme case (boot with slub_min_order=9 to get huge page sized
> > slabs) SLUB can win against SLAB:
> >
> > N=10 Time: 0.338      Minimally faster
> > N=20 Time: 0.560      10% faster
> > N=50 Time: 1.353      15% faster

On Dec 21, 2007 2:09 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> what's up with this regression? There's been absolutely no activity
> about it in the last 8 days: upstream still regresses, -mm still
> regresses and there are no patches posted for testing.

Christoph, did you see Steven's oprofile results for the hackbench
runs (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/8/198)? Any ideas why we're hitting
add_partial like crazy?

                                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/