Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Dec 21 2007 - 21:41:05 EST
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 06:22:41PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >Ok, that's a different argument than before. Ok. Although it's
> >only a few bytes.
> >
> >I would lobby for any message at least contain the suggestion to try
> >edd=off. That could save users a lot of time.
>
> The important thing is that there is a message before and after. The
> rest can be dealt with by Google on in documentation. That's what the
That means every user needs to waste at least 5 minutes to google/read
docs and be annoyed by someone's ads. Collective waste.
Just adding "Try edd=off if this hangs" is ~23 bytes and adding
that should be hardly a problem even in your 32k. Or perhaps if you're more
worried about code size than grammer "edd=off when hang" @)
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/