Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:16:24PM -0500, Loic Prylli wrote:
> I just realized one thing: the bar sizing code in pci_read_bases() (that
> writes 0xffffffff in the bars) does not seem to disable the
> PCI_COMMAND_MEM/PCI_COMMAND_IO bits in the cmd register before
> manipulating the BARs. And it seems nobody else ensures they are
> disabled at this point either (or am I missing something?).

Right, we don't.  Ivan and Greg are convinced that doing so can break
some machines.  

> FWIW, to partially answer your last question, Windows does disable
> mem-space and/or IO-space when sizing the bars of a device (I have some
> traces of configuration-space-access taken on a window machine for one
> of the PCI busses).

Now that contradicts some information we've been told before; can you
post those traces?  That would argue in favour of disabling memspace
when configuring BARs.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/