Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

[Alan Cox]

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:26:23 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on 
> > EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless.
> 
> agreed. CONFIG_BROKEN has real use - but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is pretty 
> pointless in the 90-days kernel development model.

Then I need a replacement equivalent for the ATA layer and all the other
drivers using it to indicate stuff that *IS* experimental, or not yet
known to be highly robust. Drivers are not the same as core code Ingo and
the world driver writers live in is very different to the one you operate
in as is clearly shown by this and by the _p discussion.

Still NAK.  As the alternative is

CONFIG_ATA_EXPERIMENTAL, CONFIG_NET_EXPERIMENTAL,
CONFIG_VIDEO_EXPERIMENTAL, ... all being added by developers

We will also need experimental badly in future when the EU liability
rules (and probably the US ones in a similar time scale) change so that
liability applies to software, because then it will be very important to
clearly label code that is experimental or development code as such.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/