Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

[Alan Cox]

> very much care about code size. But it has been stated in this thread 
> that most of the _p() API uses in the kernel today are bogus. So 

You missed a word "wrongly". It has been "wrongly stated"

I've been going through the ISA cases which are the majority. Generally
speaking they are correct. We have a couple of "interesting" PCI users
who most definitely want udelay() or removal of _p. We have various
chipset cases which want looking at in detail. The ISA drivers however
are both the main user and mostly right.

> ok, "I dont know but it might be slower" is a perfectly fine statement 
> instead of your original "it will be slower".

If you use wall clock timings it will be slower.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/